Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Is this a joke?
What is this chick talking about? That is one of the most rambling and incoherent editorials I've ever read.

Furthermore, she makes a point that WikiPedia is bad, and that interactive editorials would be worse—I can't imagine they'd be much worse than what she just wrote. The thing reads like it was, in fact, written by at least 5 different people who didn't have access to the preceding paragraphs when instructed to write their portion.

Weird.

1 comment:

Irina Tsukerman said...

What an awful piece of writing. And since when are "regular" editorials considered truth? They are just the opinion of the editors.